![]() |
Follow the Discoverit.fi LinkedIn company page and get special benefits. |
| Subscribe to 'A Hitchhiker's Blog of PM' newsletter | |
Reflecting further based on the earlier post 'From training to success', could success vector be used as project governance tool?
Let's combine together the earlier post 'Why do project trainings rarely produce results?' and concept of project success vector as described in the LinkedIn newsletter.

Figure 1. PM certificates.
In my previous blog post, I discussed why project training rarely produces intended results. Would PM certifications work better?
Last fall, Tuomo Koskenvaara wrote an insightful post specifically from the perspective of IPMA certificates.
Read more: Would certification work better than training or coaching?

Figure 1. Project pain.
Having been a project management trainer during this millennium, more or less, I have wondered why project training rarely produces results. There are certainly no conclusive research results on the subject, so I am careful with phrasing. Training does not automatically translate into lessons, let alone better performance. I have divided the obstacles into three categories.
I described authority bias in my earlier post. Let's see how it contributed to Titanic and Columbia shuttle accidents and how to deal with it.